Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-30542316-20180325174329/@comment-34461919-20180327232609

Udlmaster wrote: Exactly, it's not a mold, it's hardly even a guide line, it's really a recommendation. The only rule enforced is "Follow the Tiering system and give it a good enough reason for its Tier." Which shouldn't be that hard since you're the Author and Creator, you can edit freely. I've noticed people more so see Characters being listed higher then their feats or statements. I've noticed a Major one is Tier 2s, 1s & 0s. With them being made rather absent mindedly, and I agree with the Wiki telling people they need to think about what makes them their tier and why they should be that tier, and people are warned about their incorrect use of the tiering system (I'm no exception, I had completely mistiered my own characters, just that I noticed before a Mod or Admin did.). Tier 2, 1 and 0 characters aren't a joke but they've kinda become a joke, with them being host to people who don't quite understand the system yet making their character. And I understand the Wiki's enforcement of the rules because we don't want another Suggsverse, and lord knows how that's a running joke. I notice people putting 1-A without even having a hint of getting what 1-A actually is. (I also get triggered when characters have a High 1-A key (or even regular 1-A) and a lower tiered key, such as SOME CERTAIN USER who makes a bunch of keys with just about the entire tiering system over tier 10 for almost no reason).

Also, people here also should know the power gaps in tiers 2-0 (0 should be really obvious) before saying a Low 1-B vs a 1-B isn't a stomp. (I havn't seen this, but I'm sure some people would say this)