Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-26517929-20170106233600/@comment-28644276-20180410020855

First and foremost, I will ask that you just listen.

I won't counter adress the points were you say you are frustrated. Because I've been there, for quite a while, myself. Until the point I just went and assumed "The good ones will keep improving, the bad ones won't."

My point works in defense of "There are pages that fit under these high tier powers, yet are not hypocritical to call the bad pages that are also in those levels."

My point was NOT "You are wrong." or "Quality is not needed." In fact, if that was my view on this matter, I'd never have had commented anything here in regards to Seed's old content in the first place.

As I pointed out in your latest thread regarding this matter, I agree with your view of quality control. My point on the hypocrisy is that leaving that comment as wide as it originally was, it ends up affecting the gems you yourself just mentioned. It's a judgement that would affect literally anyone who commented there but happens to care about their contents.

Do I disagree with you that there are ridiculous, 0 quality pages? Not really. Though we'll probably clash in the point where I think, without a doubt, that Seed's old ones were a Prime example of the very type of page you have a problem with. Even if he did not go around telling everyone "My x beats y", the pages itself made one extremely repetitive point out of being omnipotent and above pretty much anything.

Quality control is needed? Certainly. I made the comment above myself, did I not? "My problem is only with the actually good pages that share ONE trait with these bad ones being invariably lumped together with them, precisely because there are many crappy ones happening."

I don't care for the most part about hax discussing (even my ccomments in pages reference history for the most part) so the point of people going around acting as if they made a work of art by filling some page with the word "HAXHAXHAXHAX". Then yeah, that's a horrible attitude. And I'm well aware it happens.

Precisely because it's that horrible, I understand people who don't do that wouldn't want to be indirectly thrown into that category. The part of your comment I adressed as wrong was, pure and simple, sounding like "If you have a character with high tier/hax and accuse a bad OP page, then you are hypocritical."

Whether intentional or not, it was a generalization. With your recent reply, you just made a separation by mentioning exceptions to that. So I literally have nothing else to disagree with you.