Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-26517929-20190201195934/@comment-36846645-20191017073058

"Take note that even if a character is a more than countably infinite number of times superior to an infinite-dimensional space, or similar"

This is where you are getting confused. I'm not saying infintely superior. But transcendent to infinite-D. Which we know is not the same. Sera explained this in the thread. Being infinitely superior to the characters in the stairway, is not the same as being superior to the stairway. Transcendent is the word people use when noting a being is of higher existence. Transcendent does not auto mean higher existence, but when dimensions are involved it automatically assumes that.

Im a little lost. Why would reality need to be 1-A? 1-A are above dimensions. So you only need to be superior (Existing above) to infinite dimensions or superior to dimensions altogether. They mean the same thing. As High 1-B is the last step before 1-A. So, transcending infinite dimensions, means all, thus 1-A. The confusion comes from this not copying the word for word on vsb entirely. Which had this note

"There are two options in order to qualify for this tier: There should either be a qualitative superiority over infinite dimensions; or the superiority over the concept of dimensions (in general) should be clearly explained" Which is saying they need to be superior to infinite D (By existing above, not being infinitely superior in power), or be transcendent of dimensions. They are essentially saying the same thing. It's basically saying, a 1-A has to say this or this. The wording is what is confusing when it comes to these things. If a being said "Is completely transcendent over infinite dimensions" that has no reason to be high 1-B. As that is saying, i'm above dimensions, but still on the same tier. Transcending dimensions entirely just sounds more impressive. Which is why i use that. The easiest way. Just be superior to dimensions entirely.