Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26221691-20170111062911/@comment-28644276-20170113154329

My points above we're, once again, actually agreeing with yours, so I'm not exactly sure but I'll clarify a few things anyways.

0. We can imagine in our verse, sure, but what if another author fulfills the requirements for 1-A as well, while imagining it in a different way from us? Can we say that OUR rules are the real deal in a 1-A existential condition? Not really. Hence why I agreed with your point when you said before that it is relative. Even before that, Isaid that the mechanics of 1-A vary a lot from one verse to another, to further back that up. I also brought the case by case basis a number of times, sooo, not sure. Are we even disagreeing on this at all or is this some sort of misunderstanding from one side or another? ^_^'

1. Indeed it is. Hence why I said " as it's so many infinities beyond us and even beyond (<< keywords) those infinities, that any sort of depiction will never be enough to come close to describing it.  " . Indeed it is.

2. Once again, I agreed with Venom on this a good time ago. Qualitatively superiority is the deal - a rather interesting example of this would be Hajun who, while having a Taikyoku value of Infinity, actually is justified by the fact that this value indeed gives him a qualitatively superior power to those bellow him. Pretty nice stuff.

And on the last point, yup.